As I often
discuss with my colleagues in the Senate, I am so proud of how Washington state
is leading the way – growing our small
businesses and our economy, protecting the environment, educating our children,
and so much more. I also could not be more proud of our state’s history of protecting
the rights of all our citizens, including our thriving lesbian, gay, bisexual,
and transgender (LGBT) community. Thanks to organizations such as the GSBA,
Washington is a place where all of our residents can live and thrive without
the threat of being discriminated against because of who they are or who they
love.
Of course, a
major milestone in protecting these rights was when former Governor Christine
Gregoire signed our marriage equality bill into law in 2012. It was a day of
joy and celebration for all of the loving, committed LGBT couples in our state
– and for all of us who respect and support them. It was also a day of
joy for many in our border states, such as Idaho, whose residents were now able
to travel to Washington and finally, legally marry who they love.
This victory
only became sweeter last year, when the U.S. Supreme Court struck down Section
3 of the Defense of Marriage Act and found that the federal government
may not, through its statutes, create two classes of marriage. This paved
the way for all married couples to receive equal access to federal protections
and benefits. However, despite the Court’s ruling, when it comes to
Social Security spousal benefits, same-sex marriages are currently classified
as valid only if the couple lives in a state where marriage equality is
recognized. So even though those Idahoans are legally married, in the
unfortunate instance of the death of their spouse they’re unable to access the
Social Security benefits that they’ve earned. As a result, their Social
Security applications have been put on hold.
With support
from organizations like the GSBA, Pride Foundation, and Human Rights Campaign,
Colorado Senator Mark Udall and I have come together to remove this unnecessary
burden on families who are already suffering from the loss of a loved one.
While we believe the Social Security Administration can, and should, resolve
this inconsistency through administrative action, our bill –named the Social
Security and Marriage Equality or SAME Act – provides a roadmap to
ensure equal access for all. In addition, the SAME Act would
provide more consistency among federal agency policies, falling in line with
the Internal Revenue Service, Department of Justice, Citizenship and
Immigration Services, and many other federal agencies, which currently
recognize all marriages regardless of where they live.
This current
delay of spousal benefit claims by the Social Security Administration not only
places an unfair economic burden on legally married LGBT spouses, but also an
extremely emotional one. While I believe the Administration has made
significant strides toward equal treatment of all marriages under federal law,
your zip code should not determine whether or not your family will have access
to the Social Security benefits that they’ve earned.
As we’ve seen
in recent weeks, in states such as Pennsylvania and our neighbors in Oregon,
marriage equality is becoming a reality for more and more Americans. But, there
is still work that must be done to ensure that equality does not end at state
lines. I’m hopeful our colleagues in the Senate and in the Social Security
Administration agree and help move quickly to resolve this inequality.
No comments:
Post a Comment